HRM/300 HRM300 HRM 300 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT 2
- University of Phoenix / HRM 300
- 30 Mar 2018
- Price: $12
- Other / Other
HRM 300 WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT 2
Assignment 2
Apply: Team Job Evaluation Training Presentation
Your company is getting
ready to conduct a complete overhaul of the performance management and
compensation systems for your organization. Your team has been selected
to conduct a systematic review and training on job evaluation for the HR
professionals within the department. Your goal is to help your HR peers
understand both the need for a comprehensive job evaluation process and the
relationship between employee compensation and performance.
Choose a company name to complete this assignment.
Create a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® or Microsoft® Sway® presentation that your team will use to train HR professionals
about job evaluation principles and best practices.
Include the following in your presentation:
- Define job evaluation
- Outline the process of job
evaluation
- Describe the
procedures/guidelines used to conduct a job evaluation
- Explain the benefits of
implementing a comprehensive job evaluation process with clearly defined
performance goals and metrics
- Describe the four methods of
job evaluation along with the advantages and disadvantage of each method
- Evaluate various types of
employee compensation and their relationship to job performance and
evaluation
- Use visual aids and graphics to
enhance your presentation
- Include clear and specific
presenter's notes
Team Job Evaluation Training
PresentationGradingGuide
HRM/300 Version 7
Fundamentals of Human Resource Management
Course ID:HRM/300
Course Title:Fundamentals
of Human Resource Management
Assignment
Title:Week 5Job
Evaluation Training Presentation (Team)
Total
Number of Points:10
Resource:Framework for
Human Resource Management, Ch. 12, 13
Your company is getting ready to conduct a complete overhaul of the
compensation system for your organization.
Your team has been selected to conduct training on job evaluation to HR
professionals within the department. Your goal is to help your HR peers to
understand job evaluation before your company embarks on the immense task of
redesigning the compensation structure.
Choose
a company name to complete this assignment.
Create a
10- to 15- slide Microsoft® Sway® presentation in which
your team trains HR professionals about job evaluation.
Include the following in your presentation:
o
Define job evaluation
o
Outline the process of job evaluation
o
Describe the procedures/guidelines when conducting a job evaluation
o
Describe the benefits of job evaluation
o
Describe the 4 methods of job evaluation along with the advantages and
disadvantage of each method
o
Consider using visual aids and
graphics to enhance your presentation.
o
Include clear and specific presenter’s
notes.
Use the
APA Checklist under the Course Materials Forum to ensure compliance with APA
guidelines.
Click on the
Assignment Files tab to submit your paper.
|
Dimensions
or Assignment Criteria [Type
in criterion title or summary phrase] Weight:
[indicate weight of rubric line out of 100%) |
Does Not Meet Expectations (1.00) 25% |
Approaches Expectations (2.00) 50% |
Meets Expectations (3.00) 75% |
Exceeds Expectations (4.00) 100% |
|
|
Content: Decision-making process Weight: Points Possible: 1 |
The
company name is missing and/or inaccurate. |
The
company name is minimal and vague. |
The
company name is relevant and complete. |
The
company name is unique and original. |
|
|
Content: Define and outline the process of job
evaluation. Weight: Points Possible: 1 |
Did not define
and outline the process of job evaluation. |
Minimally defined
and outline the process of job evaluation. |
Appropriately
defined and outline the process of job evaluation. |
Thoroughly
defined and outline the process of job evaluation. |
|
|
Content: Conducting
job evaluation Weight: Points Possible: 2 |
The
descriptionof the procedures and guidelines to follow when conducing a job
evaluation is incomplete. |
The
description of the procedures and guidelines to follow when conducing a job
evaluation is minimal. |
The
description of the procedures and guidelines to follow when conducing a job
evaluation is adequate. |
The
description of the procedures and guidelines to follow when conducing a job
evaluation is detailed and thorough. |
|
|
Content: Benefits
of job evaluation Weight:13% Points Possible: 2 |
Inaccurately described the benefits of job evaluation. |
Somewhatdescribed the benefits of job evaluation. |
Appropriately
described the benefits of job evaluation. |
Thoroughly described the benefits of job evaluation. |
|
|
Content: Explore job evaluation methods Weight:13% Points Possible: 2 |
Did not describe
the 4 methods of job evaluation and did not explain the advantages/ disadvantages
of each method. |
Minimally described
the 4 methods of job evaluation and did not explain the advantages/ disadvantages
of each method. |
Appropriately
described the 4 methods of job evaluation and did not explain the advantages/ disadvantages
of each method. |
Thoroughly
described the 4 methods of job evaluation and did not explain the advantages/ disadvantages
of each method. |
|
|
Content: Executive
presentation Weight:13% Points Possible: 1 |
The presentation was incomplete, slide count was not met and speaker notes were not complete. Visual aids and/or graphics not included. |
The presentation was basic. Speaker notes were minimal and sparse. Some visual aids and/or graphics included. |
The
presentation was appropriate and complete. Speaker notes were adequate. Minimum slide count requirement met. Visual aids and/or graphics included on
every slide. |
The presentation was substantial and in-depth. Speaker notes provided substantive follow-up. Minimum slide count requirement met. Unique and creative visual aids and/or graphics on every slide. |
|
|
Mechanics: The presentation is organized in a
logical and coherent manner. Transitions are used to improved flow. The author uses correct grammar and
spelling. Weight: Points Possible: 1 |
Presentation is organized in a logical or coherent manner but not both. Multiple errors in grammar and spelling. |
Presentation is generally organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions, however, are awkward. Several errors in grammar and spelling. |
Presentation is generally organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions for the most part are smooth. Few errors in grammar and spelling. |
Presentation is fully organized in a logical and coherent manner; transitions are smooth and flow seamlessly from one point to the next. No errors in grammar and spelling. |
|
|
Total Score: Total %: 100% Total points: 10 |
|
Comments: |
|||
USA 
India