PHI 220 Week 3 Discussion | Strayer University

PHI 220 Week 3 Discussion | Strayer University

Week 3 Discussion 

Please respond to the following:

·         Making a moral argument entails providing reasons for the position you take. The reasons must include facts, a clarification of any concepts used in the argument, and a standard that you are appealing to in order to come to your conclusion. Read the following case and develop a moral argument for your position.

·         In 1992, Cheryl Hopwood, a white student from a poor family, applied to the University of Texas Law School. She was turned down even though she had better grades and LSAT scores than many of the minority students who were admitted (1).

o    Is it fair for minorities from middle-class families to be given preferential treatment over whites from economically disadvantaged families?

                        Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts.

Source

1. Judith Boss. 2020. Analyzing Moral Issues. p. 362 McGraw-Hill Higher Education 7th edition textbook available at https://www.strayerbookstore.com

Bottom of Form

 

Answer Detail

Get This Answer

Invite Tutor